The Raven Foundation

randome0004.jpg

 
You are here: Blogs The Raven View Libya and the International Community: Freedom, Tyranny, and Fate

You are reading the The Raven View Blog

Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:06

Libya and the International Community: Freedom, Tyranny, and Fate

Written by Adam Ericksen

 

qaddafi

 

“We will fight for our freedom, and we are ready to sacrifice ourselves.”

Muammar el Qaddafi

 

“It is a historic moment.  It is the end of tyranny and dictatorship.  Qaddafi has met his fate.”

Abdel Havez Ghoga, National Transition Council Spokesman

 

Freedom.  Tyranny.  Fate.

 

Libyans took to the streets in celebration last Thursday as the news of Muammar Qaddafi’s fatefully violent death spread throughout the air waves.  People cheered in the streets in celebration of this historic event that many claim has brought freedom and an end to tyranny in Libya.

 

We know the fate of Qaddafi, but we don’t yet know the fate of Libya.  The chapter on Qaddafi’s freedom to rule through tyranny and violence has ended, and Libya’s next chapter has begun.

 

We should pause and reflect on how Libya arrived at this moment. The battle for Libya began last February, on what was called “The Day of Rage.”  Of course, there was good reason for rage and protest in Libya; Qaddafi’s government ruled with an iron fist, was politically and economically corrupt, and supported terrorism throughout the world, including terrorism against his fellow Libyans.  Eight months after “The Day of Rage,” Qaddafi was found by rebels hiding in a large drainage pipe, tortured, and then murdered.  Video proof of those events are apparently available for viewing online.  Pictures of Qaddafi’s bloody face are ubiquitous on the Internet.  In researching the topic, I’ve accidentally stumbled across those ghastly images.

 

Presently, many are now asking if Qaddafi’s murder was just.  The Chairman of the Transitional National Council of Libya, Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, announced yesterday that, because of demands from the international community, a “commission of inquiry into the death of Colonel Qaddafi” would be formed.

 

I’m not sure who in the international community is demanding such an inquiry, but I wonder if that demand might be hypocritical.  Libya is in this position now largely because of the international community.  The UN, France, Britain, and the US all supported and participated in the violence against Qaddafi and his regime.  Thus, the solution that the international community provided to the violence of Qaddafi’s rule was … violence.

 

Of course.  Because that’s the way violence works.  In the words of Andrew McKenna, we cannot control violence, violence controls us.  We celebrate our violence and we demand the “freedom” to use it.  Qaddafi demanded that “freedom.”  Libyan rebels demanded that “freedom.”  The international community demanded that “freedom.” But the truth is that we are enslaved to violence.  We cannot control it.  It controls us.

 

And so, Libya starts a new chapter in its history.  That chapter starts like nearly every other chapter in world history: it starts with violence.

 

So, what is the fate of Libya?

 

That chapter will soon be written.  But if Libya’s story is consistent with world history, “freedom” will continue in the form of slavery to violence.  Libya is not alone in that fate.  The international community stands with Libya in our enslavement to violence.

 

We do have a choice, of course.  We don't have to be enslaved to violence.  We are free to choose the way of nonviolence, love, and forgiveness.  That freedom is within our power.

Add comment


3 comments

  • Comment Link Adam Ericksen Monday, 31 October 2011 11:02 posted by Adam Ericksen

    Andrew - "Liberated from what?"That is exactly the question. Thanks for pointing out that chapter in Violence and the Sacred. I'll go back to it!

    Melanie - To see the imprint of Christ on Gaddafi is a radical challenge, but it is a necessary challenge. Thank you for that insight!

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link melanie  statom Thursday, 27 October 2011 16:17 posted by melanie statom

    "....When you do it to the least of my brethren you do it unto me."
    If this is true, then it must surely also be true for even the least of our brothers, even those who are murderous, tyrants. Maybe we recoil at the brutal death of such a one as Gaddafi, because, somehow, beyond his deeds of unspeakable evil, we recognize the imprint of Christ who also suffered greatly in this man.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link Andrew McKenna Thursday, 27 October 2011 14:49 posted by Andrew McKenna

    Thank you for the warning about the gory photos. I'll look no further. And, of course, I agree with all that is said here, and not just because I appear to be quoted. Actually, that is a weak paraphrase of Rene's Girard's observation, in Violence and the Sacred, in a chapter which, not incidentally, concerns the overthrow of a tyrant, Oedipus Tyrannus by name. The brutal murder of Ghaddafi does not augur well for the stability of the newly "liberated" Libya. Your editorial prompts the question: liberated, exactly, from what?

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Last modified on Thursday, 27 October 2011 12:56
Adam Ericksen

Adam Ericksen

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
1 subscriber

Comment subscription

Receive email notification when a new comment is added to this item.