The Raven Foundation

randome0005.jpg

 
You are here: Blogs The Raven View On Racial Newt-rality

You are reading the The Raven View Blog

Wednesday, 18 January 2012 15:22

On Racial Newt-rality

Written by Adam Ericksen

 

newt_gingrich

 

We live much of our lives in fear.  We fear being exposed as frauds.  We project to the world an image of ourselves that’s not entirely true in an attempt to gain the approval of others.  We conceal the bad, dirty, and ugly parts of ourselves and project other parts of ourselves that we think people will perceive as good, clean, and beautiful.

 

But there is another aspect of this self-deceptive pattern that is even more devious.  We have a tendency to project onto others the bad, dirty, and ugly parts of ourselves.  To paraphrase René Girard, “We are most indignant at the evil of others by which we ourselves are consumed” (Deceit, Desire, and the Novel, 73).

 

Few of us are immune from this pattern of self-deception.  It’s an infectious social disease that permeates human culture and it is on full national display during political season as we inspect and scrutinize candidates.  We saw it televised on Monday night at the Republican national debate.

 

The 24 hour news channels have been running the highlight of that debate since Monday evening.  (You can see the video below.)  It started when Fox News moderator Juan Williams asked Newt Gringrich a question about a claim Gingrich made while campaigning in Iowa.  Gingrich stated last November that "Black Americans should demand jobs, not food stamps."  He also claimed that “Really poor children in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working and nobody around them who works.  So they literally have no habit of showing up on Monday.  They have no habit of staying all day.  They have no habit of ‘I do this and you give me cash,’ unless it’s illegal.”

 

Williams asked, “Can’t you see that this is viewed at a minimum as insulting to all Americans, but particularly to black Americans?”

 

As Gingrich replied, “No, I don’t see that,” the audience erupted in approval.  Williams then asked if the comments were “intended to belittle the poor and racial minorities.”

 

“First of all, Juan,” Gingrich rather belittlingly responded, “the fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history.  Now, I know among the politically correct you’re not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable.”  He went on to claim that liberal “elites despise earning money” and that he wants to help people “learn how to get a job, learn how to get a better job and learn someday to own the job.”  The all white audience loved the confrontation and enthusiastically cheered for Gingrich.  After the debate Gingrich explained the enthusiasm by stating, “There was a spontaneous sense that somebody finally had the courage to just tell the truth about how we’ve got to go about helping people…”

 

The point I’d like to emphasize here is Williams’ term “racial minorities.”  Williams has been criticized by many on the right for asking a racially loaded question, while many on the left praise him for stating the obvious and then accuse Gingrich of being a racist.  Now, I don’t know if Gingrich is a racist, but Williams did ask a racially loaded question and race was an obvious issue at the debate.  Williams was the only black person in the room, and I specifically mention “the all white audience” because the incident exposed an uncomfortable truth about American self-deception when it comes to race and racism.

 

It has been said that slavery is America’s original sin, but America’s original sin is deeper than slavery, for only black people were enslaved.  The end of slavery did not end racism, nor did it end its counterpart, white supremacy.  Both continued through the practice of lynching and segregation.  It is a bad, dirty, and ugly part of American history that we would rather sweep under our cultural rug by ignoring its impact on modern American society.  “We don’t have race issues anymore,” many argue.  “We have economic issues.”  There is some truth in that statement.  Poverty doesn’t discriminate between races.  But my personal experience, which is confirmed by the experience of Monday’s debate, is that racism still plays a huge role in our culture. If we are ever going to move beyond racism in our country, we need an honest discussion about how it continues to infect our lives.

 

So, let’s be honest.  I’m infected with racism.  Like the all white audience at the debate in South Carolina, I live in a mostly white world.  I can go throughout my day without ever seeing a black person.  My neighborhood is an all white suburb just north of Chicago, my church is 95% white, and when I shop I see white faces.  The only time when I see black people is when I venture to Chicago, where many neighborhoods are all black.

 

Segregation is illegal, but don’t be deceived – whether you live in the North or the South, the United States continues to be segregated.  We have an implicitly segregated society, and segregation, whether explicit or implicit, fosters racist attitudes.  And here’s the ugly truth we don’t want to admit: we like it that way.  Because of our self-deception, we would rather not deal with the bad, dirty, and ugly truth of racism that continues to infect our nation.  We would rather show our indignation toward those racists out there than deal with the racism that infects us.

 

Is Newt infected by the evil pattern of racism?  Probably.  But so am I.  When it comes to racism, we cannot afford to be neutral.  Any accusations of racism that I levy against Newt will be an attempt to conceal my own pattern of racism.  That pattern needs to be transformed by a different pattern: the pattern of intentional acts of solidarity with people of other races.  Those intentional acts might include advocating for and participating in local intercultural events, seeking friendships with people of other races, and moving to a more diverse neighborhood.  These intentional acts, and others like them, are our only hope for overcoming America’s implicit segregation and continued racism.  Until we have the courage to live in the pattern of solidarity, segregation and racism will continue to infect American culture.

 

JavaScript is disabled!
To display this content, you need a JavaScript capable browser.

 

Add comment


4 comments

  • Comment Link Adam Ericksen Monday, 23 January 2012 16:02 posted by Adam Ericksen

    Andrew - Thank you for that comment. It makes great sense to me. Part of the problem is that we only see the sins of the other, which covers up our own. Girard's dictum - if you have a scapegoat, you don't know it - is true and haunting. We're blind. Original sin helps me to see how I'm implicated in the ugly, self-deceptive patterns of our culture. Maybe that's the first step to the scales dropping from our eyes.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link Andrew McKenna Thursday, 19 January 2012 17:50 posted by Andrew McKenna

    I think that America's original sin is not believing in original sin, at least where we are concerned. We tend to see ourselves as the good guys in any conflict. We replay again and again "the ceremony of innocence" (Yeats), The ritual is underwritten by a systemic pattern of denials, by denial as a system. It has cost us dearly, and could prove fatal to our democratic aspirations.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link Adam Ericksen Thursday, 19 January 2012 14:53 posted by Adam Ericksen

    Thanks for the comment, Tony. Your analysis is absolutely correct. I especially appreciate your point that Newt's ideology is sacrificial, and that aspect is the only reason why it "works." That is, of course, a denial of humanity and it is important to name that denial wherever we see it. Our culture is deeply infected with sacrificial mentality. Indeed, we clearly saw it as the South Carolinian crowd booed Williams. But I also see aspects of that mentality in my life/community. I think it is important to honestly name that, otherwise, I'd be covering it up. I am implicitly involved in segregation/racism, and that implicit quality is also dehumanizing, maybe even more than what we saw at the debate - for it's easier for me, and for others, to cover up.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link tony Thursday, 19 January 2012 12:56 posted by tony

    I appreciate your willingness, Adam, to own your own responsibility for institutional racism (which I obviously share), but this part of the "debate" was downright scary and there is appropriate language for what was going on here. It includes mob feeling and an incredible collective denial (Girard would call it misrecognition) of the structural deficits suffered by black people as a community (and which spread out generally to all the poor.) The ideology Newt Gingrich espouses is a complete denial of structural relationships among humans and can be traced back to the isolated self of Cartesian dualism, rooted in Augustinian anthropology and soteriology, and pursued with a vengeance by emerging capitalism from the 16th century onward. A mimetic understanding of what it means to be human (i.e. always neurally "other") points up the grotesque lack of truth in this way of thinking. The only reason why it "works" is that it is (of course) sacrificial, and that was the clear undertone of the crowd's cheering. Until we clearly name this denial of humanity MT will make little impact on the public level.

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Last modified on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 16:39
Adam Ericksen

Adam Ericksen

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
1 subscriber

Comment subscription

Receive email notification when a new comment is added to this item.