What Trump Got Right About Charlottesville

There have been times when President Trump has said true things, things that I believe need to be said, in service to a larger point that is the complete opposite of the point I wish to make. Tuesday afternoon’s remarks on Charlottesville, in which he doubled-down on his comments that “many sides” are responsible for the violence that occurred this past weekend, contained one of those kernels of truth in service to a lie. Allow me to explain.

Last Friday night in Charlottesville, VA, white supremacists from all over the country gathered around the statue of a man we are taught to revere as a champion of liberty. This is also a man who owned slaves and taught the inferiority of Africans, but we are still taught to honor him.

Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States and founder of the University of Virginia, was an ironically appropriate gathering point for those who harbor racial hatred, if an “appropriate” gathering point for those who harbor racial hatred can be said to exist. His statue serves as a reminder of how deep racism runs in this country, how intrinsic it is to our culture. While monuments of confederate soldiers are joyfully toppled and memorials to confederate generals are removed, statues of Thomas Jefferson all around the nation will remain. And the fact that he represents liberty to many of us but slavery to others should help us reflect on how unequal our country is and has been from its inception.

So when President Trump said, “How about Thomas Jefferson? … Are we going to take down his statue? Because he was a major slave owner,” he was trying to argue against the removal of any historical statue, including the statue of Robert E. Lee. Yet he unintentionally made a much larger point about how racism is foundational to our country.

Last weekend’s rally – ostensibly in protest of the removal of a Robert E. Lee statue but more accurately a chilling display of belief in white superiority and a demonstration of animosity toward multiculturalism – began with a congregation of white supremacists not around Lee but around Jefferson. This makes sense, because while the racism that infects this country is symbolized in the Confederacy and its soldiers, including Lee, it did not begin there. Though it did not begin with Jefferson, either, as a Founding Father, president, and author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson has had more influence on the shaping of our American culture than most others. His racism shaped perceptions of African slaves and African Americans for generations.

Thomas Jefferson not only owned slaves but wrote extensively about the inferiority of Africans and people with black skin. He hypersexualized black males and females, emphasizing that their “sensations” overshadowed (or completely eclipsed) their reason. His highly respected opinions gave intellectual cover to racist lies, to say the least. In fact, in her work on racism in Christianity, What’s Faith Got to Do With It? Black Bodies, Christian Souls, Kelly Brown Douglas quotes Winthrop D. Jordan as saying, “Until well into the nineteenth century, Jefferson’s judgment on the matter [of black humanity]… stood as the strongest suggestion of [black] inferiority expressed by any native American.”

Thomas Jefferson and the other Founding Fathers are known not only for their design and implementation of our government, but for their profound insight regarding human nature. It is easy to imagine, then, how Jefferson’s misperceptions and lies about black people became standard wisdom among a nation of people taught to revere him. The harm of Jefferson’s warped perspective on this matter combined with the reach of his influence is impossible to understate.

I try to imagine learning about Thomas Jefferson from an African American perspective. A lesson might come across something like this: “He was a brilliant man with deep insight into humanity, who shaped our national values so that we revere liberty. But he thought your ancestors were inferior and thus justified owning them. He wrote lies about them, raped them, and justified their exploitation and brutalization for generations to come. Years after slavery ended, many people would continue to use his words to justify the treatment of African Americans as inferior. But, overall, America is indebted to his political and philosophical mind.”

What I’m trying to say is that if we are white, and we have been conditioned with the dominant cultural narrative about our history and values, then we need to be willing to see how the African American experience in this nation for generations has been the complete opposite of every ideal we claim to hold dear.

Thomas Jefferson is just the beginning. We don’t learn in history class, for example, that Independence Day is celebrated on July 4th because, as Kevin Alexander Gray says, “[I]t’s the day after the abolitionists, or the people against slavery, relented, and allowed the anti-slavery clause to be taken out of the Constitution.”  We learn about Emancipation, but not enough is taught about how laws were immediately created to re-criminalize and thus re-enslave African Americans. We learn (but not enough) about the Civil Rights movement, but seldom do schools help children understand how years of being deprived basic rights and dignity makes the road to economic and social equality a steep uphill climb even when laws change. The active and brutal destruction of black progress by white hands, most notoriously with the burning of “Black Wall Street” in Tulsa, Oklahoma, is almost never taught. Neither is it widely acknowledged that the U.S. interstate system is responsible for destroying black communities and displacing black families.

In other words, a land of opportunity for some has been a land of exploitation and dehumanization of others. The privileges many of us enjoy have come at the expense of people who were oppressed and marginalized. And white fears of the worst within ourselves have been culturally projected onto black people to demonize them. Furthermore, the contributions of African Americans are under-represented even while monuments to those who wished to keep them enslaved litter the American landscape.

While African Americans, like everyone else, love the land and people in this country, they are able to see its ugly underside more clearly than most. This is what James Alison has called the “Intelligence of the Victim,” but what I would prefer to call, in this case, “The Intelligence of the Survivor,” because of the strength and resilience that African Americans have shown in the face of such an unequal history and blatant failure of our nation to live up to its professed values. The view from below power and privilege is 180 degrees opposite to that from above. Though pride and patriotism is drilled into all of us practically from birth, we need to open our eyes not just to our cultural blindspots, but against the mythical blinders that have wholly eclipsed the truth from our view.

Thomas Jefferson is a good place to start. He is a perfect symbol of how the American experience can be completely different for some than it is for others. I do not foresee his statues being removed, because he did have positive ideas that were foundational to this country. But the best of those ideas – the God-given equality of all people and the inherent right of liberty for all – need to be fully realized in practice. We must acknowledge where Jefferson’s interpretation and implementation of his own ideals fell short and correct them, unafraid to acknowledge and renounce those things that Jefferson got tragically wrong: namely, the full equality and dignity of black people.

By contrast, there are no redeeming qualities to justify the continued presence of Confederate monuments in any public national venue, with the possible exception of museums dedicated to depicting the horrors of slavery and war in their full, hideous truth. Far from honoring history, they keep us in denial to the horrors for which the Confederacy stood and gloss over the ugliness of slavery with a veneer of honor. Their continued presence can only serve a lie – either the lie of white supremacy or the lie that the Civil War’s primary cause was not slavery. Their removal would be an act of repentance. We can and must remember the worst of our history without honoring or glorifying it.

So we can take Donald Trump’s very true statement about Thomas Jefferson being a slave owner, use it as a reminder of the inequality embedded in our nation, and take it to a different conclusion. Rather than erase history, the removal of certain monuments can facilitate a more honest understanding of history. The violence in Charlottesville was made possible by ignorance and denial, facilitated in part by the continued presence of Confederate monuments. They should come down, statues of African American leaders and others reflecting our diverse culture should come up, and real history should be taught, to dispel the lie of white supremacy and move us closer to the equality for which we claim to stand, thus living into the best of Thomas Jefferson’s vision more fully than he could have ever imagined.


Image: Screenshot from Youtube: “White nationalists hold torch lit march through UVA campus,” by All InOne News.

Change your view; change the world! Subscribe to the Raven ReView and never miss an article! New subscribers receive the free e-book, Dodging the Parenting Trap by Rev. Adam Ericksen and the MP3 “Before I Take A Stand” by singer-songwriter and Raven Board Member Michael McLean.

2 replies
  1. Allen Ray Johnson
    Allen Ray Johnson says:

    There’s a bigger problem than confederate statues. For example, when Ulysses Grant became President, he sent some of his generals (Sherman, Sheridan) to force plains Indians onto reservations, including purposely killing off the buffalo they depended upon. Andrew Jackson, of course, disregarded the Supreme Court and forced eastern tribes into the western territories. Christopher Columbus was cruel and his crews and those who followed him perpetrated unspeakably monstrous genocide upon the native people of the Caribbean.
    So streets, buildings, cities, states as well as stamps and coinage are named after such racist genocidal people.
    The Russian city, Stalingrad, had its name changed back to Volgograd. There are no German cities, streets, or coinage named in honor of Hitler or his henchmen.
    On a related topic, we need to be aware of “Jacobin” response to white supremacy. Rene Girard’s mimetic theory shows that rivals and opponents readily become “doubles” that accelerate and intensify conflict. Is defending confederate statues by “alt-right” and tearing them down by “alt-left” such a double? And will either of these sides effectively scapegoat the other sufficiently to bring about social harmony? This is a time for honest, calm, truthful conversation on who we want to be as a nation and to forge a future with positive national “external role models” (Girardian here again).

    Reply
  2. Janis Price
    Janis Price says:

    Abraham Lincoln authorized the largest mass hanging of Dakota Sioux (Google dakota 38) because they wouldn’t cave to the forced removal from their homeland, so shouldn’t his statue be removed. They are my ancestors but I wish to live my life progressing beyond blame, division and hatred so do not need it removed. We all have bad and good in ourselves and I believe slave owners did too. Let’s all move on with our lives, forget petty things (stones [statues] can never hurt me) and focus on teaching the next generation to never let those atrocities happen again.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *